Who will attack the competitors? How political parties resolve strategic and collective action dilemmas in negative campaigning
Negative campaigning presents parties with a collective action problem. While parties would prefer to have their competitors attacked, potential backlash effects from negative messages mean that individual politicians typically lack the incentives to carry out such attacks. We theorize that parties...| Link(s) zu Dokument(en): | IHS Publikation |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Article in Academic Journal PeerReviewed |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
SAGE
2017
|
| Zusammenfassung: | Negative campaigning presents parties with a collective action problem. While parties would prefer to have their competitors attacked, potential backlash effects from negative messages mean that individual politicians typically lack the incentives to carry out such attacks. We theorize that parties solve this problem by implementing a division of labour that takes into account the incentives of individual office holders, their availability for campaign activity, and media relevance. Drawing on these arguments we expect that holders of high public office and party leaders are less likely to issue attacks, leaving the bulk of the ‘dirty work’ to be carried out by party floor leaders and general secretaries. Examining almost 8000 press releases issued by over 600 individual politicians during four election campaigns in Austria, we find strong support for our theoretical expectations. |
|---|