The Drama of Responsible Research and Innovation: The Ups and Downs of a Policy Concept
This contribution addresses the question why Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is facing problems to succeed as concept for research and innovation policy in the European Commission, despite the EC’s 20 years of history of funding research activities and coordination and support actions that...| Link(s) zu Dokument(en): | IHS Publikation |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Book Contribution PeerReviewed info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Springer
2023
|
| Zusammenfassung: | This contribution addresses the question why Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is facing problems to succeed as concept for research and innovation policy in the European Commission, despite the EC’s 20 years of history of funding research activities and coordination and support actions that address science and society relations. Our analysis highlights four interrelated elements that contribute to the instability of RRI as policy concept, i.e. semantic, legal, financial and institutional fragility. We use Sabatier’s advocacy coalition approach (1998) to explain how these elements of fragility developed and how the ups and downs of RRI as policy concept played out. We identify three opposing advocacy coalitions with regards to RRI and analyze their belief systems and resources. |
|---|