The EU's Commission Regulatory Scrutiny Board: better regulation or biased influence on legislation?
Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 46-52| Link(s) zu Dokument(en): | E-Medien Publikation |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Monograph |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien
2023
|
| Ausgabe: | Stand März 2023 |
| Schlagworte: |
Inhaltsangabe:
- Contents
- Executive Summary
- Zusammenfassung
- 1. Introduction
- 2. What is the Regulatory Scrutiny Board (RSB)?
- 3. The RSB between better regulation and increased politicisation
- 4. Data and Methods
- 4.1. Interviews
- 4.2. Case selection
- 5. The EU’s ‘better regulation’ agenda: A deregulation agenda?
- 5.1. The inception of the better regulation agenda
- 5.2. The Commission’s white paper
- 5.3. The war on the red tape and the ‘Stoiber group’
- 5.4. The establishment of the RSB
- 5.5. A new approach by Ursula von der Leyen: All about costs?
- 6. The work of the RSB in EU’s legislative process
- 6.1. Assessment criteria: Focus on economic impacts?
- 6.2. Meetings of the Board and its opinions
- 6.3. Impact assessments and the RSB’s work
- 6.3.1. RSB’s second negative opinions: Delaying gender rights?
- 6.3.2. Share of and reasons for negative opinions
- 6.3.3. Economic impacts and current challenges
- 6.4. Evaluations and fitness checks and the RSB’s work
- 6.5. Other activities by the RSB
- 7. The RSB and its structure: Rules of procedure, members, and (semi-)independence
- 7.1. Composition and educational background of the current Board
- 8. ‘Voices of the critics’: The RSB in EU’s legislative process
- 8.1. Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence
- 8.2. EU Circular Economy and the consumers’ right to repair
- 8.3. Labour market policies: Work-life balance and minimum wages
- 8.4. Shortcomings of the RSB
- 9. Policy recommendations and Conclusion
- 10. References