Public services in bilateral free trade agreements of the EU

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Link(s) zu Dokument(en):E-Medien Publikation
Hauptverfasser: European Federation of Public Service Unions (HerausgeberIn), Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien (HerausgeberIn), Krajewski, Markus (VerfasserIn)
Format: Monograph
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: AK Wien 2012
Schlagworte:
Inhaltsangabe:
  • Abstract
  • Table of contents
  • I. Introduction
  • II. A primer on public services and trade agreements – What’s all the fuss about?
  • 1. Why are public services special?
  • 2. Areas of potential conflict between trade agreements and public services
  • a) Positive and negative list approaches
  • b) Market access and national treatment
  • c) Disciplines of domestic regulation
  • d) Rules of procurement and subsidies
  • e) Regulatory issues and competition law
  • f) Summary
  • 3. Public services in current trade negotiations
  • III. Existing public service exemptions in international trade agreements
  • 1. GATS and GATS-type clauses
  • 2. Exemption clauses in the EU-Chile and EU-Mexico agreements
  • 3. NAFTA and NAFTA-type clauses
  • 4. Public utilities clause
  • 5. Exemptions clauses applicable to competition law
  • IV. Analytical framework
  • 1. Substantive scope
  • a) Functional definitions
  • b) Sector-based categorisations
  • c) Hybrid approaches
  • (1) Public utilities
  • (2) Services of general (economic) interest and other EU law concepts
  • d) Assessment
  • 2. Level of protection
  • a) Complete carve-out
  • b) Schedules of commitments or reservations
  • c) Exemptions applicable to other obligations
  • d) Assessment
  • 3. Summary
  • V. Models of public service exemptions
  • 1. The traditional GATS and EU FTA approach
  • 2. The NAFTA approach
  • 3. The new EU approach
  • a) General exemption for non-economic services of general interest
  • b) Reservation for public services or services of general economic interests
  • c) Sectoral reservations
  • d) Assessment
  • VI. Two proposals for reform
  • 1. Increasing legal certainty and providing for specific carve-outs
  • 2. Providing more flexibility: The case for a simplified modification of commitments
  • VII. Conclusion